According to TOGAF standards, which term applies when an implementation has no features in common with the architecture specification?

The term that applies when an implementation has no features in common with the architecture specification is referred to as non-conformant. In TOGAF, compliance and conformance pertain to how well an implementation aligns with predetermined architectural standards and specifications.

When an implementation is described as non-conformant, it signifies a clear departure from the expected features outlined in the architecture specification. This lack of alignment means that the implementation does not adhere to the guidelines set forth in the architecture framework, which can lead to issues in integration, functionality, and overall effectiveness within the enterprise architecture context.

Understanding the implications of non-conformance is critical in architecture practices, as it highlights the need for alignment between implementation and specifications to achieve desired outcomes and operational efficiencies.