Which one of the following best describes a reason to adapt the ADM and take a federated approach?

The choice that describes a reason to adapt the Architecture Development Method (ADM) and take a federated approach is aligned with the characteristics of a very large and complex enterprise. In such organizations, various divisions or departments may have different architectural needs, cultures, and operational requirements. Utilizing a federated approach allows these distinct parts of the organization to maintain some degree of autonomy while still adhering to the overarching principles and guidelines of the ADM.

This adaptation is essential because a one-size-fits-all approach can often lead to inefficiencies or misalignments within the organization. By recognizing the complexity and scale of the enterprise, decision-makers can better tailor the ADM to effectively meet the specific requirements of different sectors while ensuring that the overall architecture remains cohesive.

The idea of complexity highlights the necessity for flexibility in the framework, allowing for adjustments that prevent bottlenecks and facilitate communication and collaboration across a diverse organizational landscape. Thus, the federated approach serves to strike a balance between consistency and flexibility, making it particularly well-suited for large and complex enterprises.